Sharpness is the same, Nikon is the better made, has more features, wider range, etc. It's a matter of how "picky" you are about maximum quality. Jerry "rafortuno " wrote: > > I am looking at buying either a Canon Canoscan FS4000 or a Nikon > Super Coolscan 4000 ED. Both are 4000 dpi, but the Canon is much > cheaper. Does anyone have any recommendations between the two? > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanner recommendation
2002-12-30 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.