Paul, are your figures % of dmax? Or did you correct for the log scale? Just trying to figure out how they correspond to mine changes. Robert On 9/12/01 8:53 AM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > Mike, > > You asked: > >> Has anyone else measured the actually loss in density of Piezo prints? > > I ran a comparison fade test in my florescent light tester with MIS > (standard quads) and Piezo inks. Both were on Epson Archival Matte, and > both were in the fader at the same time, so other possible variables were > kept to a minimum. After 300 hours the MIS 50% patch had lost 4.6% density. > The Piezo test strip had lost 7.6% in the 50% patch. (The two blacks had > both faded 15%, but because of the intensity of the light, the black would > absorb more and heat up more. So, I think the test conditions exaggerate > the relative fading of the dark tones.) > > For most parameters I'm looking at, by 300 hours in my fader the rate of > change has slowed considerably. So, while these prints may never totally > stabilize, I think at the 300 hour point we can see what the prints will > look like after the prints have "warmed" completely. > > While the Piezo faded 65% more than MIS, neither had really faded that > dramatically. I continue to agree with the consensus of south-window > testers that color shifting is more significant than fading. I'll send the > scans of the test strips and control strips to Martin to put in the files > section of the forum. (See Fade-MIS-Pzo-300Hr.jpg) > > I would be curious if the scanned images look like what south-window testers > see, and how long it takes for south-window prints to take on this color. > > EAM is the champ when it comes to fade resistance among the paper I've > tested. I don't know what paper was being used below, but the alleged 2 > stop fading in 60 days seems extreme. I would guess there are some factors, > perhaps including display conditions, that we don't know about. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > ______________________________________________ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael J. Kravit [mailto:kravit@...] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:16 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Piezo - Loss of Density > > > Last eveing I was speaking with another photographer by telepone. He > told me that in California Huntington Witheral is ready to give up on > Piezo because his display prints are losing 2 stops of density after > just 60 days on display. > > Supposedly he has spoken with Jon Cone and Cone told him it was his > paper. So he has tried numerous papers and has not been able to keep > the prints from losing density (fading). > > Has anyone else measured the actualy loss in density of Piezo prints? > > MIke > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ---------------------- Robert Morrison rmorrison@... 310-397-2704 4131 Bledsoe Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90066
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezo - Loss of Density
2001-09-12 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.