Got it. Antonis and I are using his spectrophotometer to read the 21 step wedges. I have previously reported the dmax for the 100% black. We have full spectrum information but haven't figured out how best to communicate the information. Just looked at the your scan that martin posted. Do you have a fade of a more neutral MIS sample. The one that I see is very warm to even the piezo. My guess is that as you tone the MIS blue that you will bet much poorer fade results...but that is just a guess. Robert On 9/12/01 6:09 PM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > Robert wrote: > >> Paul, are your figures % of dmax? Or did you correct for the log scale? >> Just trying to figure out how they correspond to mine changes. > > I use a scanner to measure the differences, scanning the test strip along > with the control strip. I then use the Photoshop Histogram tool to measure > luminance and RGB values. When I look at fading, all I'm doing is taking > the percentage of fade (lightening) of the selected area (for example the > 50% patch of the 21-step test file print) relative to the starting > luminance/brightness of the particular patch. > > Paul > > > On 9/12/01 8:53 AM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > >> Mike, >> >> You asked: >> >>> Has anyone else measured the actually loss in density of Piezo prints? >> >> I ran a comparison fade test in my florescent light tester with MIS >> (standard quads) and Piezo inks. Both were on Epson Archival Matte, and >> both were in the fader at the same time, so other possible variables were >> kept to a minimum. After 300 hours the MIS 50% patch had lost 4.6% > density. >> The Piezo test strip had lost 7.6% in the 50% patch. (The two blacks had >> both faded 15%, but because of the intensity of the light, the black would >> absorb more and heat up more. So, I think the test conditions exaggerate >> the relative fading of the dark tones.) >> >> For most parameters I'm looking at, by 300 hours in my fader the rate of >> change has slowed considerably. So, while these prints may never totally >> stabilize, I think at the 300 hour point we can see what the prints will >> look like after the prints have "warmed" completely. >> >> While the Piezo faded 65% more than MIS, neither had really faded that >> dramatically. I continue to agree with the consensus of south-window >> testers that color shifting is more significant than fading. I'll send > the >> scans of the test strips and control strips to Martin to put in the files >> section of the forum. (See Fade-MIS-Pzo-300Hr.jpg) >> >> I would be curious if the scanned images look like what south-window > testers >> see, and how long it takes for south-window prints to take on this color. >> >> EAM is the champ when it comes to fade resistance among the paper I've >> tested. I don't know what paper was being used below, but the alleged 2 >> stop fading in 60 days seems extreme. I would guess there are some > factors, >> perhaps including display conditions, that we don't know about. >> >> Paul >> http://www.PaulRoark.com >> >> ______________________________________________ >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael J. Kravit [mailto:kravit@...] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:16 AM >> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [Digital BW] Piezo - Loss of Density >> >> >> Last eveing I was speaking with another photographer by telepone. He >> told me that in California Huntington Witheral is ready to give up on >> Piezo because his display prints are losing 2 stops of density after >> just 60 days on display. >> >> Supposedly he has spoken with Jon Cone and Cone told him it was his >> paper. So he has tried numerous papers and has not been able to keep >> the prints from losing density (fading). >> >> Has anyone else measured the actualy loss in density of Piezo prints? >> >> MIke > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ---------------------- Robert Morrison rmorrison@... 310-397-2704 4131 Bledsoe Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90066
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezo - Loss of Density
2001-09-13 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.