> > I made a simple test yesterday that seems, to me, to validate that > premise. Here was the set-up: I exposed took two rolls of film with > each frame containing the same image. I used the new plusx. The first > roll was at my 'normal' EI 64 ( exposed 1/60s @ 5.6) developed in D76 > 1:1 for 7:15. The second roll was exposed at EI 40 (exposed 1/60s @ > f4) and developed for 5:00 D76 1:1. > > As you would expect the 'normal' negative was much denser in the > highlights. I scanned one frame from each film strip on a sprintscan > 120 using vuescan. The little density meter in vuescan (for whatever > it is worth) gave a density range of ~.35 to ~1.85 for the 'normal' > negative and ~.4 to ~1.5 for the N- negative. I set vuescan to scan > B&W, 16 bit, Neutral color balance, with black and white points set to > 0%. > Something here that I don't understand. For having a N and N-1 negative you must expose them in the same way and develop differently. You have made different expositions so you have here a N negative and a "M negative" not a N-1. Or, am I missing something?? Best Regards António Vieira http://www.livinginabox.net
Message
Re: Zone Development Update (longish)
2003-01-10 by livinginaboxvieira <newsletters@caselas.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.