Hi Andrew. I have made a couple comparison prints between 2880 and 1440 DPI using Hextone inks, and the 2880 was just a hair sharper and smoother. Couldn't see ANY dot pattern in either print. Yes, it does appear to be a marketing thing, but I still feel the 2880 print was just a hair better. Of course we are picking nits here. And yes, it took much longer to print. I'd only do it for absolute maximum quality; you'd hardly ever need it in routine printing. Jerry Andrew Rodney wrote: > on 1/16/03 9:45 PM, jim hayes: > > >>A few days ago Colorbyte e-mailed me an update which allows mat paper >>printing at 2880 (even though it looks as if it's available in the >>pull down). No profiles for mat paper at 2880 exist yet AFAIK though. > > > > You do NOT want to print at 2880. First, with IP or the Epson driver it > takes forever but worse, you lose variable dot dither. The 2880 is IMHO more > a high figure to look good to marketing than anything else. Print with IP at > 1440; you'll get a better print and in far less time. > > Andrew Rodney > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 IP5 Grayscale
2003-01-17 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.