Paul, have you seen any results of the piezotone COOL inks yet? Jerry Paul Roark wrote: > > James, > > >...about to switch inks from the original Piezo/Sundance. > >.. replacing them with either Piezotones, or a blend of > >MIS FS-N (80%) & FS (20%) inks. > > >...ink/print permanence > > PiezoTone midtones are more lightfast than the FS and FS-N, although the FS > are better than the old PiezoBW/Sundance. > > >... DSS syndrome > > This is not a problem with either inkset as far as I know. > > >I have read Jon Cone's published accelerated-aging tests of > >Piezotone inks in comparison with MIS FS inks, and his claims > >of under 2% fading of Piezotone, vs. a 17% fading, accompanied > >by significant color shift, for FS inks. > > The tests appear to be valid. From what I can tell, I think that the FS > inks do have a bit of dye in them. This burns off quickly at first. With > the FS, this causes both some fade and substantial warming. The FS-N fades > just like the FS, but it does not warm. So, visually, the FS-N would look > much better in these comparison tests. > > Note that once the small amount of dye burns off, the remainder and bulk of > the FS inkset is pigment, which will be much more stable than the initial > warming/fading period might suggest. That is, one cannot extrapolate the > initial dye burn-off to the long-term relative fade performance. The fade > rate is not linear, it slows substantially with the FS inks. > > (I'm now assuming the black FS-K from which the FS inks are mixed does have > some small amount of dye in it. That is simply the best explanation for the > performance of the FS midtones. Neither I nor, from what I'm told, MIS has > information from the manufacturer of the black ink about the dye content.) > > >... FS-N is color/tone stable. > > Yes. It does fade at the same rate as the FS inks, however. If you mix FS > and FS-N, you will get some warming due to the FS inks. > > (Comparison of different fade tests is apples and oranges. So, I'm avoiding > some of the numbers that have been mentioned.) > > >...I'd like your current thoughts on this matter of fade and > >color/tone stability of FS-N ink. ... > > I still use FS-N, which is reasonably stable and looks good for a long time. > That said, the new PiezoTone midtones raised the bar substantially. When I > originally mixed the FS-N, it easily beat the PiezoBW. At that time only > the Epson Archival inkset seemed to have an advantage, and it's metamerism > made it unusable. > > Times have changed. The PiezoTone midtones are excellent, as is the > UltraChrome inkset and it's ability to print reasonably good B&W. When I > did comparison fade tests, I saw that the FS and VM inksets really were no > longer in the top performance category. > > So, now I'm upgrading the inks I use. An Epson Archival black-based inkset > (no metamerism in the black) is aimed at the high end of the neutral > Piezo-compatible inksets. I hope that MIS will mix it, but that is their > decision, and I have not received any from them. I'll mix it if I need to. > I think it will be the ultimate in ink permanence with today's technology, > and that is where I want to go. > > Today, I'm fine-tuning a new VM inkset that is in the UltraChrome class. > > The direction I'm going is pure pigment (no dyes at all and fade tests that > are consistent with this) and glossy-paper compatibility. The two inksets > mentioned above are ready to go as soon as MIS puts them through its tests > and decides whether to mix then and when to release them. A new vm-s that > is Epson Archival ink-based will be next. > > So, in a few weeks there should be a full range of what I'd call "class A" > (in the 100 year and up range) inks out there for B&W printers. Right now, > I don't think the FS or VM inks are in that class. Technology has moved on. > > >I am also concerned that the Piezotone inks may, in the future, > >lead to DSS or other problems affecting Epson print-heads. My > >understanding is that the MIS FS and FS-N inks have not > >exhibited clogging or DSS problems. Are you aware of any > >reports of DSS with the MIS FS and FS-N inks? > > I can't speculate on future ink performance. I am told by MIS that they > have a number of tests that avoid some of the problems that other inks have > had. However, this could be competitive puffing, and I don't want to get in > the middle of that. With any new product, there is some risk of > unanticipated problems. Reputations and track records are obviously > important in this respect. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Permanence - Paul Roark
2003-01-18 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.