That's a pro SLR... not a consumer/prosumer grade product. I personally favour grain in mono work; I like the texture, look and feel it adds to the image. I frequently find myself artificially adding grain/noise to the image in Photoshop - I gues I'm a grain addict (it depends on the image of course)... Despite being this way; I just can't bear the too orderly, patterned, non natural look of the noise in most digital cameras (inspect the sky in most images and you'll understand what I mean). This was the main reason that lead me to sell my 3Mp digital camera (Casio QV3000) just a couple of months later (this was 2 years ago)... Regards, Loris. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Olson [mailto:jerryolson@...] > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:39 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Hi I have a few questions > > > Lois, I have the Canon D60, with a CMOS chip. Absolutely no > grain, no > noise, until you get above ISO 400. > > Jerry > > > > Loris Medici wrote: > > Hi Jerry, > > > > Digital cameras have no grain but a grain-like "CCD noise" > which looks > > pretty ugly when combined with Bayer interpolation > artifacts (we are > > speaking about consumer/prosumer level cameras here). For detailed > > information you may read the "in depth reviews" and > "learn/glossary" > > sections of the wonderful Digital Photography Review > > (http://www.dpreview.com) site - every review has a section > dedicated > > to noise evaluation/comparison and hot/stuck pixels. > > > > Regards, > > Loris.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Hi I have a few questions
2003-01-22 by Loris Medici
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.