On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:25 PM, Bill Iverson <wiverson@...> wrote: > How about color negative vs. B&W negative? ... For a year I tried shooting the finest-grained color negative film I could find -- Konica Impresa 50. However, after that extended experiment, I returned to B&W film. The increased grain after "filtration" in the computer out-weighed the advantages of the color information. Color negative film can be very fine-grained, but the grain increases with filtration. The color film depends on all 3 colors -- all the layers -- to achieve its fine grain. Each color emulsion has to be exposed with only a part of the spectrum. As such, each layer is like a faster film in terms of its grain. The combined fine-grain effect is like a multi-sample of a relatively noisy signal. When combined, the noise is averaged and much reduced. The computer "filtration," however, eliminates the multi-sampling effect and causes the image to look like it was taken with a higher-speed film. (One can also do a grain-reducing multi-sample with B&W film by taking 3 fast shots on a tripod and combining the skies in the computer.) Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] b&w neg or colour transparency
2003-01-29 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.