I love my new LCD after 20 years of CRT's. Contrast and brightness are far superior. Now I'm not at critical as some but I must spend 8 hours a day looking at a monitor between work and home. Image matching works fine with the LCD. (a $300 Samsung 15") Another reason is real estate. The depth of a big CRT is just too much for my desk at home. If you want big, the NEC salesman came by today with a new 30" LCD monitor. I think retail is $3,495 if you're deep of pocket. BTW, if anyone knows anyone who has three 61" NEC plasmas, I need them desparately for a job we are doing. NEC has none, distributors have none. I'm hoping to find them somewhere. I already have the touch panels for them and the rest of the system has been built. It's a F-16 pilot debriefing system using images from the nose mounted camera and our customer is leaving for an extended overseas assignment in about ten days. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Keith Cooper <yahoogroups@n...> wrote: > Hello > > I'm interested to hear people's views on the relative merits of CRTs and > LCDs for photo work(b/w and colour). A browse of the web suggests that LCDs > are not quite there yet for exacting uses (limited gamut/viewing angles) > -unless you want to spend a lot of money. > > The only person I know who uses an LCD for critical work, uses an Apple 23" > one that they bolt to the desk before I visit - I see its price has just > been reduced to $1999 :-)) > > > bye for now > > Keith Cooper > > Northlight Images > http://northlight-images.co.uk > Photography - Digital Imaging - Apple Mac Consultancy > > Tel +44 (0)116 291 9092 Mobile +44 (0)780 162 9397
Message
Re: LCD vs CRT for a new monitor? -views sought
2003-01-30 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.