--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., meander@m... wrote: > You are more or less asking for the history of producing Quad tone > prints from an ink jet printer. Martin and I were recently discussing how interesting it would be for someo= ne to compile, there are certainly many gaps in my knowledge of it. What an excellent post Jerry, I just have a few footnotes. snip > Dan Culbertson and Tyler Boley were producing workflows for the 3000 > using MIS Quad tone inks on papers such as Somerset Velvet. Dan was way ahead of me, and I was essentially trying to grasp all the info he kept posting and make it work for me. I was so captivated and excited by what I was learning I tended to post a lot, but I was definitely a follower. At this point, Dan and others reported less than satisfactory results with Icefields, so though it was still available I never tried it. A lot of > people were applying those workflows to the Photo Ex. It must be said > that the prints produced were quite acceptable. Really? It worked for somebody?! > > In tandem with Dan and Tyler, people like Dan Burkholder and Strange > Ross were developing work flows for more specific uses. ... I think there are others that were working independently but quietly. One was Jon Cone, he was developing and teaching similar techniques at his workshops. Obviously he is a leading quad expert, culminating in Piezography and it's continued development. I'm sure there were other expert printers out there perfecting similar workflows for there own purposes. > At the risk of driving you into the depths of paranoia, one of the > problems that will never be solved is the inconsistency between > batches of paper. .. This is a very good point. Another issue cropping up is that the newest generation of Epsons have manufacturing tolerances (voltages, etc.) that are possibly too loose for the non OEM materials and workflows we work with. > Tyler´s post it looks like Icefield has been updated, perhaps he has > more information about that. There was an inquiry about it on the 9000 list, and I was interested that there was the reply I mentioned. I don't know if it's actually been updated or simply still available. My lacking understanding of it is that it created a 4 channel pre-screened (stochastic, as you mentioned) file, separated to work with the then standard MIS set, postscript I would think. A postscript RIP driver was then required to print it, no one was happy with what was available at the time. I wonder what PressReady would do with it? Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What happened to Icefields?
2001-09-16 by tyler@tylerboley.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.