On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 11:03 AM, Chris Hargens <ldmr@...> wrote: > To be able to dispense with glass would be reason enough to go with > coating prints. Non-reflective glass is expensive, and the > requirement of glass in frames in general is a hassle. > > Chris How would you mount the coated prints for display? I'm assuming that if you eliminate the glass then there also would be no mat since the primary function of the mat is to keep the glass away form the face of the print. An unprotected mat would also be quite susceptible to dirt and damage. Flush mounting?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Coating Prints was Ilford Smooth Pearl Inkjet paper
2003-02-04 by Carl Schofield