Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??

2003-02-08 by Chris Hargens <ldmr@cruzio.com>

Yes, a semigloss with the strenghs of matte without its defects. 
Matte paper is great, but it's not always the best choice for a given 
image. I'd like to see a paper with the surface of traditional glossy 
fiber paper, something that allows for deep blacks, etc. but doesn't 
have the excessive shine of RC gloss.

Chris


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Truman Prevatt 
<tprevatt@m...> wrote:
> Where I see the biggest area for progress is in the papers and I 
think 
> there will be progress in the future on that front. I would like to 
see 
> a good quality semigloss finish that didn't look different for 
every 
> viewing angle.  But all in all I'm satisified enough that all I use 
my 
> darkroom for is developing negatives.

> >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page 
is at:
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
visiting this same page.
> >
> >Please follow these basic guidelines:
> >- Include your full name with your message.
> >- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
to keep them short.
> >- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
header.
> >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> >- Complete your Yahoo profile.
> >- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
various resources on the homepage. 
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.