Has any paper manufacturer ever admitted there is a flaking problem with their coated papers? Seems like that issue has been along for so long, surely some of them would address it. Jerry Truman Prevatt wrote: > > I recall when I had a very active wet dark room, several different types > of paper, several different chemicals, different toners, etc. Then there > were all the tools for dodging and burning. To get a good print from a > virigin negative it took at least 10 sheets of paper and sometimes two > or 3 sessons. > > I'm not sure there was anything "simple-off-the-shelf" about it. > > I settled on a 1280 vs. 2200 since a) I don't do much color and if I > want to it will be for snapshots so I'll just get a lowcost letter size > printer for that. It also seems that printing B&W with color inks is a > mindfield of potential problems and I selected a good printer with good > B&W support with black and white inks. > > I started out with the VM since I do like the ability to be able to > "tone" my prints to whatever warmth or coolness that goes best with the > image. There was a bit of a learning curve but I must say, using > software tools on scanned 4x5 images to produce a final print is much > easier and effective than all the wet darkroom techniques. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] WHEN will we get simple, reliable BW printing??
2003-02-09 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.