--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Todd Flashner <tflash@e...> wrote: > mention above, but based upon what you have seen, how would you say their > gamut, depth of black, metamerism, etc., compare with pigs on coated papers? > > Todd Todd, gamut and depth of black are far less on uncoated papers no matter which ink, without question. Metamerism, I don't know, I've only done tests with color images that don't show it well. Because the dye is actually absorbed into the uncoated paper metamerism may very well be different. If those qualities are the priority, coated papers are the way to go. If not, I've seen some lovely prints with dyes and uncoated. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: For Ken: Uncoated papers was: Reference Print/Reality Check
2001-09-18 by Tyler Boley