Hello Ernest, Peter and Everyone, >BO vs. quads? That's crazytalk! I agree. This whole thing started off with Peter griping about the current state of the technology and has evolved into a debate about BO vs quad/hex printing, which I think is absurd. I'm a bit dismayed by this, so for the record, I have _never_ stated that BO is as good or better than good Q/H-tone. My reasons for promoting it are and have been: 1) To let people know it exists, that it is capable of producing beautiful prints, that it has advantages of its own such as BW+color from one printer, and to gain acceptance as a valid and relatively easy alternative to other techniques. 2) To dispel myths and false concepts about it which are passed around, most of which I believe sprang up from earlier times when printers were not as capable as the newer ones. I think it's fine if people want to continue discussing BO printing (after all, it's one of my favorite subjects <g>), but please don't turn it into a debate around the idea that it's "better" than Q/Hex printing. I don't think anyone has ever claimed that. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Hey Everybody! (was Re:BO vs quad)
2003-02-13 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.