Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Hey Everybody! (was Re:BO vs quad)

2003-02-13 by Clayton Jones <cj@cjcom.net>

Hello Ernest, Peter and Everyone,

>BO vs. quads?  That's crazytalk!

I agree.  This whole thing started off with Peter griping about the
current state of the technology and has evolved into a debate about BO
vs quad/hex printing, which I think is absurd.

I'm a bit dismayed by this, so for the record, I have _never_ stated
that BO is as good or better than good Q/H-tone.  My reasons for
promoting it are and have been:

1) To let people know it exists, that it is capable of producing
beautiful prints, that it has advantages of its own such as BW+color
from one printer, and to gain acceptance as a valid and relatively
easy alternative to other techniques.

2) To dispel myths and false concepts about it which are passed
around, most of which I believe sprang up from earlier times when
printers were not as capable as the newer ones.

I think it's fine if people want to continue discussing BO printing
(after all, it's one of my favorite subjects <g>), but please don't
turn it into a debate around the idea that it's "better" than Q/Hex
printing.  I don't think anyone has ever claimed that.

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.