I use the 1280 with MIS/VM/Roark Curves, right out of the box, so to speak. Works great. Highly recommended. Use the MIS CIS, a bit fussy to set up but works well.
Jeffrey
http://www.happyeyeball.com
----- Original Message -----
From: carlislematthew <carlislematthew@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 11:19 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] 2200 for color & 1280 for B&W
Here's how it happened, from start to beginning. Please excuse the
terseness, but I'm sure you've all heard it before so I'll try and be
brief. The question is at the end if you want to skip the crap.
-Bought 1280. Loved it from the start, but paper choice and profiles
sucked for "archival" color work. B&W using color sucked more.
-Didn't like the idea of paying hundreds for Piezography or similar
system, so never bought that. Didn't know about MIS inks or similar
things at the time. I wish I had known about this forum!!!
-2200 came out! Reviews (not from Epson) talked about how wonderful
the B&W output was. No metarism apparantly, and anyway I had no idea
what the hell that actually meant. Had gray balancer - wonderful!
-Bought 2200. Color work is excellent. Can use favorite semi-gloss
paper without it looking like crap, and it will last more than a year
or two, so I can now give pictures away without feeling cheap.
-B&W not so good. Getting neutral gray almost impossible even with
gray balancer. I start to quickly learn about metamerism in the same
way that you learn very quickly about a rare disease you just
caught. I wasted about 100 bucks on paper and inks with Gray
balancer and still am not there.
-Start looking into these RIPs. Download PowerRIP demo (thanks
Daniel). Actually looks pretty damn good (I recommend trying it),
but still is not there for me because I'm just really fussy. 0-10%
looks fairly dotty. Thought about IP5, but 500 bucks is a bit much.
Metamerism still exists but it is VERY reduced over normal color
B&W. Can't say why - no flatbed scanner or microscope.
-Use BO mode. Awful awful awful. I agree with Peter that some
people just can't see the dots. That's great for them, but it really
bugs me. It just doesn't look smooth. Not good enough. Bah.
-I start to look over at my old 1280 sitting in the corner. I never
got round to selling it, and that would probably only get me about
200 bucks. Can't get Imageprint for 200 bucks, PowerRIP still
doesn't cut it at that price.
So that's my history in B&W printing. Thank God I live in Seattle
and the thought of being outside taking pictures is just nowhere in
my mind. If I lived somewhere nice I'd feel bad that I have spent
all this time on my "photography hobby" with nothing to show for it.
Why am bothering to tell you all this? Well, I'm thinking about
using the old 1280 with MIS VM inks and those Roark curves. From
reading other posts it seems like I might up and running in an
evening or two, especially as I'm quite good with printing step
wedges and messing around with curves.
Would anyone else recommend this as a good setup? Anyone else had
the same experience and gone back to the old, rejected Epson?
Thanks in advance!
Matthew
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] 2200 for color & 1280 for B&W
2003-02-13 by Jeffrey Fass
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.