On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Seth Rossman wrote: > > Sorry, Clayton, I don't really agree with that. Most things between 0 > and > ~13 in PS are too black for an ink to differentiate -- they're just > black. > Same applies to white. Anything above 244-246 is a specular highlight; > therefore, just paper white. > > Just MHO. Not a new thread!! > > Seth > You're speaking offset press values, for setting files at the max and min dot a press can handle some presses require a 2 to 5% dot as you've sort of described... you set your whitest white in your image that is not a specular highlight with your white eyedropper (that has been set at the required dot percentage), letting the specular highlights (if there are any) fall to paper white. Setting your black point at a value of 13 gives the image a 95% black, not something you want to do when printing quads... It's not the ink. It is the ability of the partitioned workflow/ driver/ RIP/ Profile/ whatever to separate the steps as you have prepared them within your file... I do this better than I write it, I hope that came out with some sense. Carolyn
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Pail black images using pigment ink
2003-02-14 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.