Here, from today's MacInTouch.com, is a footnote relevant to my contention (below) that Sony's GDM-F520 might be preferred to Sony's Artisan Color Reference System (GDM-C520K). Now I'm not so sure: I hadn't realized that Karl Lang was involved with the Artisan. Sam >Dave Dahlberg followed up on a problem with Sony's high-end Artisan display: > >Sony has fixed the Artisan's $1,800 calibrated display's USB issues >under Mac OS 9 (unplug 2 USB cables, reboot, plug in cables, rerun >software, hope for no errors). The updater is at:[GDM-Cxxx Display >Support] > Incidentally, your pre-press readers may be interested to know >that this monitor was architected by Karl Lang, formerly the >architect at Radius who designed the Industry Standard Pressview / >Colormatch reference system for pre-press. He's brought his years of >calibration expertise to the Artisan and it shows. > This is not some puck attempt at calibration of any monitor. The >software directly controls the video circuitry of the display, >including blacks, like a $5,000 Barco, and supports the different >colorspaces of D50 (print), D65 (photo) and Web. I replaced a >Pressview and couldn't be happier (especially with the USB bugs >fixed). >I don't disagree with Robert about this: > >At 7:12 PM -0800 1/31/03, Robert Morrison wrote: > >The move from 24 to 22 is nothing compared to moving to an LCD with respect > >to sharpness...have you seen a high end CRT next to a high end LCD display? > >They are sitting in front of me...and I can tell you there is no comparison > >with regards to sharpness. > >but I wasn't trying in the post quoted below to argue about that. >What I was trying to argue is that the Sony "Artisan Color Reference >System" (GDM-C520K) has some stiff in-house competition from Sony's >other high-end CRT, the GDM-F520. > >This is irrelevant, of course, unless you think you might need or >want a CRT. I don't, particularly, but then I also don't want to have >to replace my video card, add an adapter, and worry about OS9 >compatibility issues. And I do want to be able to use my next monitor >with the notebook I'd get to use with a digital camera. But that >notebook would I think be the 12-inch PowerBook, and it's >incompatible with the Apple (LCD) Cinema Displays. So ... : > >At 2:47 PM -0800 1/31/03, Sam A. McCandless wrote: > >I'm thinking hard about getting one of the new Sony Artisan > >(GDM-C520K) monitors, but I also think Sony has a strong in-house > >competitor in the GDM-F520 (no "K"). It's not new; it's > >second-generation. It's sharper (22mm vs 24mm dot pitch), removing > >some of the advantage the LCDs have in that regard. Some of us > >already have a way to profile it so don't need that feature on the > >Artisan and don't know how good it is anyway. Also, the no-K F520 has > >BNC connectors as well as HD15, its accessories are more extensive, > >and it's $100 less. > >[snip] > > > >Sam > > > >Sam McCandless samcc@...
Message
CRTs: the best Sony (was Re: [Digital BW] Re: LaCie vs. Sony vs. Mitsubishi)
2003-02-18 by Sam A. McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.