I haven't seen banding in any of the prints I've made on my 2100, but I don't really see why anoyone would want to use it on another printer either, since the only useful thing it does is to get rid of metamerism om the 2100 - if you're don't need Postscript that is. And if it's really true that the Epson RIP produces prints free of metamerism that is probably the better (and cheaper) choice. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Keith Cooper <yahoogroups@n...> wrote: > Hello > > I've tried PowerRIP on an 1160 and 1290, and found both inferior to using > the Epson drivers, with banding and somewhat coarse dithering. > > To be fair, it is sold as a proofing solution rather than for photos. I was > told by someone on a Mac group that it does however handle weird and complex > postscript very well! > > There is a new Mac OSX version available as a demo -- has anyone tried it? > > bye for now > > Keith Cooper > > Northlight Images > http://northlight-images.co.uk > Photography - Digital Imaging - Apple Mac Consultancy > > Tel +44 (0)116 291 9092 Mobile +44 (0)780 162 9397
Message
Re: PowerRIP. What is it? Request Settings for 1280!
2003-02-19 by danielstaver <daniel@petraflux.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.