Digital BW, The Print

Different messages not properly marked by me, even though I thought I did so.

Peter Palmieri

  From: plnelson2003 <peter@...> 


  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Peter Palmieri 
  <pcpalmieri@c...> wrote:

  > The ones printed with the Epson RIP with the workflow
  > described above were the unanymous choice.  I looked
  > at the prints with a magnifying glass which did not 
  > reveal any dots or lines. The prints were viewed in
  > bright sunlight, natural light indoors and under 
  >incandescant light indoors. We could not see any 
  > metamerism not matter how we held the pictures in the
  > light. 

  and then below that he wrote . . . 

  > Results with ink set to Grayscale were horrible.  
  > The shadows were blocked up from about 85-100%  I had 
  > much better luck with the ink set to Color,
  > although it still did not give a smooth neutral gray ramp.

  Were both of these from the same message or was one a 
  quote from an earlier message that wasn't properly marked
  as a quote?  They sound contradictory. 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]