Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Canon RAW conversion software

2003-02-20 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>

Diane,

Thanks, I will take a look at both.  The Canon raw converter is too 
slow to be useful.

Steve

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Diane Fields" 
<picnic@c...> wrote:
>   Steve,
> 
> I don't know if you are aware of either Breezebrowser or Yarc Plus 
but they
> are both RAW converters that are excellent.  I have been  using
> Breezebrowser for several years and recently tried YarcPlus--they 
convert,
> allow for batch conversions, lots more--and WAY better than the 
Canon
> software and extremely reasonably priced.   Both offer excellent 
support.
> 
> http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/
> http://www.pictureflow.com/YarcPlus/Pages/YP-Main.html
> 
> Diane
> -----------------
> Diane B. Fields
> picnic@c...
> http://www.pbase.com/picnic
> 
> << Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:41:35 -0000
>    From: "Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@h...>" <skobrin@h...>
> Subject: Re: Camera Raw
> 
> <<Does anyone have actual experience with this plug-in.  I often 
shoot
> in raw format with my Canon G-2 and while the Canon software works
> <<well, it takes a very long time to convert and process these 
files.
> If Camera Raw is appreciably faster, I would spring for it.  I have
> no problem with what is output from the Canon software -- just the
> time the gnomes take processing the image.  (Sorry if this is off
> topic for the list.)
> 
> <<Steve

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.