Diane, Thanks, I will take a look at both. The Canon raw converter is too slow to be useful. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Diane Fields" <picnic@c...> wrote: > Steve, > > I don't know if you are aware of either Breezebrowser or Yarc Plus but they > are both RAW converters that are excellent. I have been using > Breezebrowser for several years and recently tried YarcPlus--they convert, > allow for batch conversions, lots more--and WAY better than the Canon > software and extremely reasonably priced. Both offer excellent support. > > http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/ > http://www.pictureflow.com/YarcPlus/Pages/YP-Main.html > > Diane > ----------------- > Diane B. Fields > picnic@c... > http://www.pbase.com/picnic > > << Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:41:35 -0000 > From: "Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@h...>" <skobrin@h...> > Subject: Re: Camera Raw > > <<Does anyone have actual experience with this plug-in. I often shoot > in raw format with my Canon G-2 and while the Canon software works > <<well, it takes a very long time to convert and process these files. > If Camera Raw is appreciably faster, I would spring for it. I have > no problem with what is output from the Canon software -- just the > time the gnomes take processing the image. (Sorry if this is off > topic for the list.) > > <<Steve
Message
Re: Canon RAW conversion software
2003-02-20 by Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@hotmail.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.