Digital BW, The Print

Steve,

I don't know if you are aware of either Breezebrowser or Yarc Plus but they
are both RAW converters that are excellent.  I have been  using
Breezebrowser for several years and recently tried YarcPlus--they convert,
allow for batch conversions, lots more--and WAY better than the Canon
software and extremely reasonably priced.   Both offer excellent support.

http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/
http://www.pictureflow.com/YarcPlus/Pages/YP-Main.html

Diane
-----------------
Diane B. Fields
picnic@...
http://www.pbase.com/picnic

<< Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:41:35 -0000

   From: "Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@...>" <skobrin@...>
Subject: Re: Camera Raw

<<Does anyone have actual experience with this plug-in.  I often shoot
in raw format with my Canon G-2 and while the Canon software works
<<well, it takes a very long time to convert and process these files.
If Camera Raw is appreciably faster, I would spring for it.  I have
no problem with what is output from the Canon software -- just the
time the gnomes take processing the image.  (Sorry if this is off
topic for the list.)

<<Steve

Diane,

Thanks, I will take a look at both.  The Canon raw converter is too 
slow to be useful.

Steve

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Diane Fields" 
<picnic@c...> wrote:
>   Steve,
> 
> I don't know if you are aware of either Breezebrowser or Yarc Plus 
but they
> are both RAW converters that are excellent.  I have been  using
> Breezebrowser for several years and recently tried YarcPlus--they 
convert,
> allow for batch conversions, lots more--and WAY better than the 
Canon
> software and extremely reasonably priced.   Both offer excellent 
support.
> 
> http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/
> http://www.pictureflow.com/YarcPlus/Pages/YP-Main.html
> 
> Diane
> -----------------
> Diane B. Fields
> picnic@c...
> http://www.pbase.com/picnic
> 
> << Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:41:35 -0000
>    From: "Stephen Kobrin <skobrin@h...>" <skobrin@h...>
> Subject: Re: Camera Raw
> 
> <<Does anyone have actual experience with this plug-in.  I often 
shoot
> in raw format with my Canon G-2 and while the Canon software works
> <<well, it takes a very long time to convert and process these 
files.

> If Camera Raw is appreciably faster, I would spring for it.  I have
> no problem with what is output from the Canon software -- just the
> time the gnomes take processing the image.  (Sorry if this is off
> topic for the list.)
> 
> <<Steve