Jerry: So I wonder if it's that my HWM is brighter than your HWM or if my EEM is creamier than your EEM? Maybe the HWM is initially brighter because of added brighteners which degrade over time. That might support the general thinking that the EEM is relatively "more archival" than HWM which is what Paul Roark alluded to. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Olson <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > Bob, My EEM is whiter than my HWM. But I got the HWM a long long time > ago.... > > Jerry > > Bob_Michaels wrote: > > Jerry: HWM is visibly whiter but EEM is marginally thicker. I have to > > say the brightness of HWM is more noticeable than the thickness of EEM. > > Bob Michaels > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Olson > > <jerryolson@r...> wrote: > > > >>Its thicker and whiter. (EEM that is). > >> > >>J > >> > >>I've sort of settled on HWM because of price and > >> > >>>availability. But I have a lot of respect for your sage advice, so > >>>help me understand the advantage to EEM. > >>>Bob Michaels
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-22 by Bob_Michaels <Bob@BobMichaels.org>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.