Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] MIS GP Archival Inkset

2003-02-22 by Paul Roark

Ernst,

What I heard from MIS is that some of the standard Epson desktop printers --
1280, for example -- pump out too much ink for the standard "high load" MIS
7600 Archival (UC clone) inks to absorb correctly on glossy paper.  The
pigments pile up and one gets different levels of gloss.  So, the GP inkset
has a slightly reduced level of pigment in it to avoid this problem.

Apparently the 7600 actually pumps you less ink than the 1280.  This avoids
the problem of too much pigmentation on the paper.

My experience seems to indicate that the 7000 puts out less ink than the
1280 and might be fine with the full load of the MIS 7600 UC clone inkset.

I am not a beta tester for MIS color inks, so I have no experience with this
problem.  The MIS 7600 inks that I've used in the 1160 and 7500 seem fine,
but those have not been the full color inks.  To me, lower load means lower
gamut and dmax.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com


________________________________________
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ernst Dinkla [mailto:E.Dinkla@...]
  Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 8:49 AM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MIS GP Archival Inkset


  Paul, you wrote:

  > The new MIS GP Archival inkset is not a B&W inkset.  It's a
  color inkset
  > that takes the UltraChrome-equivalent "MIS 7600" inkset to a
  pigment load
  > that works better with the printers that were not designed for
  high-load
  > inks.
  >
  > >I'm presently using MIS-FSN ink with an Epson 1160. I will
  have to re-
  > >order soon and I just come across these new inks from MIS.
  >
  > I assume FS-N will be available for some time. I don't think a
  replacement
  > for this ink exists at the current time.
  >
  > >1- What are the advantage of MIS GP Archival Inkset over the
  MIS-FSN
  > >as to dmax and lightfastness if any.
  >
  > The new variable-tone/mix inkset that I've mixed is based on
  the MIS 7600
  > UC-clone inks.  The Photo and Light blacks are not only RC
  paper compatible,
  > but also significantly more lightfast than the base inks used
  in the FS
  > inkset.  This vm version -- my UC VM 4.3 -- has not been
  released by MIS
  > yet.
  >
  > MIS has a new high-load matte black also, but it has not been
  released, as
  > far as I know.  It's just like PiezoTone Museum.  It's so good
  I wouldn't be
  > surprised if MIS uses it in all it's inksets for matte paper.
  But, the FS
  > black is also quite good.  So, I would not hesitate to continue
  to use it.

  It looks like the advantages of the high pigment loaded inks are
  not there for 5000/7000/9000 printers either. At least MIS is
  quite vague about the use of the GP Archival and MIS 7600 in
  these printers. Sounds we have to upgrade the 9000 to 9500 status
  after all. Is that correct ?


  Ernst





        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
              ADVERTISEMENT




  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.