When I talked to Epson Tech Support they said that the new RIP showed no difference in b/w printing compared to the standard 2200 driver. ETS said there was no consideration in improving b/w performance when the RIP was designed. I have the Image Print RIP with the 2200 and the Piezo system with the 1160. The IP RIP is technically cleaner with great rendering of shadow detail and consistent highlight containment. BUT I think the 1160 Piezo looks better. Even with the color variations allowed by the IP RIP the Piezo is more pleasing to the eye. ALSO the 1160 Piezo system has a finer dot pattern than the 2200 IP RIP. There is almost no metamerism with the IP RIP, I believe, because there is no yellow ink. This has probably been stated before. Frank http://www.photoeye.com/frankward --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Vincent Orlando <orlandovl@h...>" <orlandovl@h...> wrote: > > Didn't look at any non rip prints. He was testing the rip to see if > it would in fact print dead neutral-which it did > > Vinny > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "plnelson2003 > <peter@s...>" <peter@s...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Vincent > Orlando > > <orlandovl@h...>" <orlandovl@h...> wrote: > > > > > > Geo DeWolfe is the editor at large for Camera Arts mag and has > > > been testing the Epson 2200 with Epson Rip. Those are the > > > prints I looked at. > > > Dead Neutral > > > > And could you see the metamerism in the non-RIP prints?
Message
Re: Epson RIP - was: UC metamerism, yellow ink & confusion
2003-02-22 by culturalvisions <fmward@hotmail.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.