Michael, Many thanks for the information and experiences you have posted. I hope I did not give the impression I was doing VM and Roark workflow down :) - I just appreciate it is different! The only puzzle I have from your comments is that of the build up you mention for Piezo on the pads - I know what you mean and see exactly the same on my 1160, 7000 and 1160 running Cone color pigs (as an aside... Clog free :). It is perhaps less of a problem withg the Color, but it's difficult for me to say with reliability... as I have done less Color printing. What I am asking here is... wouldn't you expect that with a pigment / particulate based ink? Or, put another way, can anyone explain why MIS VM does not do this? Perhaps a lower pigment concentration... or? I'm just an amateur scientist(!) so please forgive if overall, this question is irrelevant! Best regards, and once again, thank you for the informative posting... Nij > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael J. Kravit [mailto:kravit@...] > Nij, > > I have just completed 2 months of testing and working with Paul > Roark to develop curves for the MIS Variables on the 7000 (PC). I > believe you are right when you say that there is a great amount > of flexibility with this system. I just wanted to give you me > opinions now that I have had a substantial amount of time to work > with and compare the two systems. > > 1. The dreaded DOT. <snip>
Message
RE: [Digital BW] What happened to Icefields?
2001-09-19 by Nij
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.