On 2/22/03 4:37 PM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > Also, the new EAM/EEM seems to hold the high-load blacks better than > PhotoRag. As such, for example, the new MIS matte black hits 1.69 on EEM > with the 7500 and only 1.67 with PhotoRag. This is consistent with what I have found with the Epson Ultrachrome matte black as well. Has anyone tested the new Cone Museum black for dmax with photorag and EEM? Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Robert Morrison