On 2/22/03 4:37 PM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: >> Also, the new EAM/EEM seems to hold the high-load blacks better than >> PhotoRag. As such, for example, the new MIS matte black hits >>1.69 on EEM with the 7500 and only 1.67 with PhotoRag. Robert wrote: >This is consistent with what I have found with the Epson >Ultrachrome matte black as well. >Has anyone tested the new Cone Museum black for dmax with >photorag and EEM? I only have an EEM dmax reading for Museum -- and it's identical to the new MIS matte black. Their fade (or lack thereof) test results are identical also. Good stuff. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Paul Roark