Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?

2003-02-23 by Paul Roark

On 2/22/03 4:37 PM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote:

>> Also, the new EAM/EEM seems to hold the high-load blacks better than
>> PhotoRag.  As such, for example, the new MIS matte black hits
>>1.69 on EEM with the 7500 and only 1.67 with PhotoRag.

Robert wrote:

>This is consistent with what I have found with the Epson
>Ultrachrome matte black as well.

>Has anyone tested the new Cone Museum black for dmax with
>photorag and EEM?

I only have an EEM dmax reading for Museum -- and it's identical to the new
MIS matte black.  Their fade (or lack thereof) test results are identical
also.  Good stuff.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.