Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re[4]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w

2003-02-23 by Richard Sintchak

Sunday, February 23, 2003, 2:21:12 PM, Seth wrote:

S> =Just curious as to what your thinking is in that if we scan 
S> =the negatives we should just do digital images in the first place?
S> =
S> Once you scan, you ARE digital.

True enough.  But even though I might scan my B&W negs I still get the
benefits of choosing which film to use for the result I want not to
mention the control I have in developing my film too.

S> It's just a LOT of extra work.\ufffd Processing, scanning plus all the Photoshop
S> work.\ufffd But, add dust removal, etc. to the equation.

IMO, it's not "extra work" at all compared to darkroom.  Personally I
disliked all the chemical mixing, set up, temperature controlling,
working in the dark and then CLEAN UP!  Ugh.  To me all those things
more than offset for all the digital "extra work".  Oh, and dust
removal was always part of my traditional darkroom experience too.


Best regards,
 Richard  

mailto:richard@...

L i n k s  t o  m y  g a l l e r i e s:
http://fujirangefinder.com/document.php?id=246

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.