Sunday, February 23, 2003, 2:21:12 PM, Seth wrote: S> =Just curious as to what your thinking is in that if we scan S> =the negatives we should just do digital images in the first place? S> = S> Once you scan, you ARE digital. True enough. But even though I might scan my B&W negs I still get the benefits of choosing which film to use for the result I want not to mention the control I have in developing my film too. S> It's just a LOT of extra work.\ufffd Processing, scanning plus all the Photoshop S> work.\ufffd But, add dust removal, etc. to the equation. IMO, it's not "extra work" at all compared to darkroom. Personally I disliked all the chemical mixing, set up, temperature controlling, working in the dark and then CLEAN UP! Ugh. To me all those things more than offset for all the digital "extra work". Oh, and dust removal was always part of my traditional darkroom experience too. Best regards, Richard mailto:richard@... L i n k s t o m y g a l l e r i e s: http://fujirangefinder.com/document.php?id=246
Message
Re[4]: [Digital BW] best scanner for b&w
2003-02-23 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.