Mine was viewed originally under bright flourescent but one of those with the color of incadescent. But, I just took them outside to view them in late afternoon daylight and the conclusions are the same. HWM is a tad brighter than EEM. Photo Rag is the creamiest of all, and by a noticeable amount. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Seth Rossman" <seth@m...> wrote: > Thanks, Truman. > > Bob, what about your viewing? > > Thanks, > > Seth > > =-----Original Message----- > =From: Truman Prevatt [mailto:tprevatt@m...] > =Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 4:54 PM > =To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > =Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated > =more archival than EAM/EEM !? > = > = > =Diffused daylight. > = > =Truman > = > =Seth Rossman wrote: > = > =>But, neither of you gentlemen has said in EXACTLY what light you are > =>looking at them. Brightness and type could play a > =significant role in > =>eyeballing papers (?!?!) > => > =>Seth > => > =>= > =>=Truman: This is amazing. I pulled out an image I just printed > =>=on all three papers. Critically comparing the HPR and EEM > =>=prints side by side, I simply can see no difference in the > =>=blacks, shadow detail or highlights. And, the base of the EEM > =>=is very slightly whiter than the HPR. All different from your > =>=observations. Maybe they vary in production batches. Anyway, > =>=very puzzling. > =>=Bob Michaels > => > => > =>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > =>and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > => > =>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > => > =>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or > =you wish to > =>unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this > =>same page. > => > =>Please follow these basic guidelines: > =>- Include your full name with your message. > =>- Include the address of your website, if you have one. > =>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > =>keep them short. > =>- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the > =subject header. > =>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks > =or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > =>- Complete your Yahoo profile. > =>- Before posting a question, search the message archives and > =the various resources on the homepage. > => > => > => > => > =>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > =>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > => > => > => > => > => > = > = > = > = > =Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, > =Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The > =page is at: > = > =http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > = > =If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or > =you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership > =preferences by visiting this same page. > = > =Please follow these basic guidelines: > =- Include your full name with your message. > =- Include the address of your website, if you have one. > =- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > =messages to keep them short. > =- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the > =subject header. > =- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks > =or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > =- Complete your Yahoo profile. > =- Before posting a question, search the message archives and > =the various resources on the homepage. > = > = > = > = > =Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > =http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > = > = > =
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-23 by Bob_Michaels <bob@bobmichaels.org>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.