Nij, The assumption is that a manufacturer or vendor will always promote their products as being superior and the best. Hopefully they also believe that is true. The shaky ground is to move from "My product is great." to "My product is better than all others." to "My product is better than brand x." to "Brand x is terrible." At some point you cross the line into what I call "negative advertising" where you have more to say about the deficiencies of the competition than you do about your own product's benefits. My impression is that negative advertising is a very risky venture and may cut in both directions. The less of this the better. I am not saying that ConeTech or MIS have gone there but they seem to be pointed in that direction at times. All the end users pick hardware, software, ink sets, cameras, etc. and then tend to be biased in the direction of their choices. (Unless of course it didn't go well then they are biased in the opposite direction!) Human nature. I find a world of difference between saying "..the best I have ever seen." and "..the best that anyone has ever seen." I hope that we will all arrive at a set of artistic tools that will allow us to give reality to our different visions. At the same time I hope that we will all remember that there are many ways to do the same thing and let the other guy do it his way. You should be excited about the C80! A printer specifically designed to use pigmented inks! Maybe it will be great with Piezo. I am surprised ConeTech did not add the 2000P to their line of supported printers. Why did they choose the 7000 over 7500? What are the head differences between the 1160, 1200, 1280, 2000P, C80, 7000 and 7500? Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Nij" <nigel@m...> wrote: (snip earlier)
Message
Re: Piezo and Epson Drivers/Printers was: What happened to Icefields?
2001-09-19 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.