Can't speak to the RIP, but gray gamma definitely matters. Images will look significantly darker in gamma 2.2, which obviously affects your levels, curves, etc. decisions. I learned the hard way when I was testing my web site and found its photos looked great on Macs...and way too dark on PC monitors. Not sure where the old adage that you use 1.8 on Macs came from, but I now routinely ignore it, as it mainly seems to reduce compatibility in our PC-dominated world. Doug > > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:03:11 -0000 > From: "chipcarterdc <chipcarterdc@...>" <chipcarterdc@...> > Subject: Re: Epson 2200 RIP workflow > > Excellent info, and thanks for posting it. Just one question. One > of your steps is > > "Open Photoshop and your image then assign the profile "Grey Gamma > 2.2" to the image." > > I'm using a Mac, so I assume I'd do Gamma 1.8 here. The more > important question is, why does it make a difference what Grey > profile you assign (or whether you leave the image in RGB mode, as > some of my images as RGBs)? I mean, I can easily change the profile, > but I'm just curious as to why or if it makes a difference with the > RIP.
Message
Re: Re: Epson 2200 RIP workflow
2003-02-24 by Doug I.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.