What I have taken away from this discussion is Epson seems to have problems with quality control on their papers. Every once in awhle a yellow batch comes our. Right now it is "blue." Is this common with Epson EEM? I never skimped in the Darkroom on paper - Oriental or Brillance vs. Kodak or Ilford. The paper and film are the least expensive part of most photographs. I might spend more on gas getting to a photo site than I do on paper. T Seth Rossman wrote: >Geez. See? So many variables. Beyond everyone seeing things a little >differently, if we take Roark's densitometer readings into account, the >papers would look different. Both are equally "bright," but one is magenta; >the othe blue. Late afternoon sunlight --in February-- is extremely warm, >so would make them look different. Ever so slightly. > >What do brighteners do in the densitometer equation? My educated guess is >that the X-rite sees them differently (more equally) than we do while >holding the paper out in daylight. > >Seems to me some of the Mitsubishi papers were magenta, so I quit using them >right away. I think someone said last week that they do some of the >coatings for Epson, so who knows. > >Thanks for the feedback. > >=From: Bob_Michaels > >=Mine was viewed originally under bright flourescent but one of >=those with the color of incadescent. But, I just took them >=outside to view them in late afternoon daylight and the >=conclusions are the same. HWM is a tad brighter than EEM. >=Photo Rag is the creamiest of all, and by a noticeable amount. >= > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- Include your full name with your message. >- Include the address of your website, if you have one. >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. >- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." >- Complete your Yahoo profile. >- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more archival than EAM/EEM !?
2003-02-24 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.