Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Epson RIP vs ImagePrint 5

2003-02-25 by Thomas Fors

A while back I tricked ImagePrint into only using Black and Light Black inks
and remembered the result was very warm.  I just dug that print out and
compared it to the Epson RIP prints I just made.

While the Epson RIP print is warm, slightly sepia looking, it's not quite as
sepia as the Matte Black + Light Black only print. There may be some other
inks being mixed in there.  Tomorrow, I'll look at it under the microscope
at work and see what's going on.

--Tom


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Morrison" <rmorrison@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson RIP vs ImagePrint 5


> If in fact the Epson RIP is printing with only Light Black and Black ink
the
> print will look like the Sepia Piezotones, not at all like the Selenium
> Piezotones as stated in one of the previous posts. The print will also be
> much warmer than the warmest print possible using the tint picker in
> Imageprint.  Imageprint get's its smoother dither by adding photo magenta
> and photo cyan to the light black in the hilights...it avoids metamerism
by
> not using yellow.  As a result a Warm (100,100) print in the tint picker
is
> much cooler than pure light black and black.  I know because I'm running
the
> 2200 with single channel control with an experimental driver and can fire
> channels independently...so I know exactly what a print made with only
light
> black looks like.  If the Epson RIP is getting a dither as good or better
> than Imageprint's with only light black and black then they are definitely
> using a new dither not previously available...because running the standard
> Epson dither with just light black results in very course hilights.
>
> Robert
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.