A while back I tricked ImagePrint into only using Black and Light Black inks and remembered the result was very warm. I just dug that print out and compared it to the Epson RIP prints I just made. While the Epson RIP print is warm, slightly sepia looking, it's not quite as sepia as the Matte Black + Light Black only print. There may be some other inks being mixed in there. Tomorrow, I'll look at it under the microscope at work and see what's going on. --Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Morrison" <rmorrison@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Epson RIP vs ImagePrint 5 > If in fact the Epson RIP is printing with only Light Black and Black ink the > print will look like the Sepia Piezotones, not at all like the Selenium > Piezotones as stated in one of the previous posts. The print will also be > much warmer than the warmest print possible using the tint picker in > Imageprint. Imageprint get's its smoother dither by adding photo magenta > and photo cyan to the light black in the hilights...it avoids metamerism by > not using yellow. As a result a Warm (100,100) print in the tint picker is > much cooler than pure light black and black. I know because I'm running the > 2200 with single channel control with an experimental driver and can fire > channels independently...so I know exactly what a print made with only light > black looks like. If the Epson RIP is getting a dither as good or better > than Imageprint's with only light black and black then they are definitely > using a new dither not previously available...because running the standard > Epson dither with just light black results in very course hilights. > > Robert > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson RIP vs ImagePrint 5
2003-02-25 by Thomas Fors
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.