Sandy and Robert, If you would like, I can forward to Robert what you (Sandy) already sent to me. That might save you some hassle in printing these all over again. I can vouch for the similarity. The piezotone selenium is slightly cooler, closer to neutral, and printed details in a patch of grass better (not sure why; there's no loss of detail anywhere else in this particular Epson RIP print), but I still like the Epson RIP print better overall. With the naked eye, the Epson RIP print seems much smoother to me in the monotone sky. The piezotone print looks a little more coarse in that area. No doubt if you looked through an 8x loupe, the tables would be turned on smoothness, but I'm more concerned about the naked eye. I have the Epson RIP myself now and am getting similarly great results using Sandy's workflow. (See my previous post on this for details.) Yes it is warm -- warmer than selenium piezotone, but not quite as warm as Black Only. It is warm in a way that I find quite attractive. Personally I would not trade this for piezotone. Steven Gray photopilgrim.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "sanfo2003 <SandyCornelius@c...>" <SandyCornelius@c...> wrote: > > I have a light black and black ink only 2200 print sitting next to > > a Selenium piezotone print as well...and they are nothing alike. > > > Robert, > A print made with "black only" using the Epson driver yields a print > with a tone that is what I will call "tan". You're right, very very > warm and nothing like Piezotone Selenium. But print the same image > with the RIP and it looks like Piezotone Selenium. I would be happy > to send you (no charge, of course) a couple prints from the same > image, one from the RIP and one from Pieziography using Selenium > Piezotones and you can check it out yourself. Some folks seem to be > skeptical of this RIP comparison to Pieziography/Selenium and I need > a credible witness. As far as what's going on to accomplish this, > well, I'm afraid I would be getting in over my head to make a > conjecture -- I'll leave that up to people who understand these > things better than I. > > -Sandy
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson RIP vs ImagePrint 5
2003-02-26 by maracaholics <maracaholics@yahoo.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.