Digital BW, The Print

> C'mon, Jerry-

> You know those P&S high MP don't have more "resolution" at 1/4 the price.
> Are you juyst toying with him?

Seth, a Canon D60 is hardly a point and shoot. Neither is the Sigma. I
know they aren't top of the line, either.

Until the Canon's recent $9000 with 11 megapixel camera, the D60 took
the best pictures of any of the competition under 6 megapixels. And yes,
I've seen plenty of Nikon D1x pictures. Canon D60 is still the best
under 6 megapixels.

Six Megapixels was until recently the best there was in the 35mm
interchangeable lens cameras.

> 
> What we have is the camera companies sucking in amateurs with megapixel
> counts. Six or eight MP stuffed onto a tiny CCD means to "anti" resolution
> events happen:  A bunch of smaller pixels and a ton of interpolation!  So
> what?!  People that buy into that are running around still saying, "Mah
> kem-ruh teks gud pitchurs!!"  Then they print out on a $49 Lexmark.

My D60 takes Excellent pictures, and I use  1280 printers with a
calibrated monitor, profiles, and CIS systems.

> Not even worth arguing with, buddy.

True!

>Jerry