Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley

Paul,

Tough to compare from the on screen views. Comparing the Septone prints to
the scans on your site I would guess that the VM 4.3 can go colder than the
Septones. On the warm end things aren't so clear as the Septone looks more
red warm and the VM 4.3 more yellow warm. Really need to see the prints side
by side.

It will be interesting to see what ConeTech has to offer at PMA. I bet it
includes a variable tone and 7 ink solution though. Pretty sure their
solution and Sundance's will be more costly than MIS inks and your curves.
No surprise there!

The really nice thing to my view is that there will be multiple solutions to
appeal to a wide range of needs, tastes and budgets. Things are continuing
to get better for us end users. It should really be an interesting year as
these products become available and user reports come in.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html



----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
To: "DigitalB&WPrint" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3


> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new Sundance
> Septone inkset at
>
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my UC VM 4.3
> inkset for comparison.  See
>
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
>
> It may be my imagination, but it seems like the UC VM 4.3 inkset has a
> larger range.  It is also RC paper compatible, and -- just taking a wild
> guess here -- cheaper.  But I'm sure there's a lot to be said for the RIP.
> (Where did they get the name "RIP?")  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
>
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.