Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

[Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

[Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Paul Roark

Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new Sundance
Septone inkset at

http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm

I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my UC VM 4.3
inkset for comparison.  See

http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html

It may be my imagination, but it seems like the UC VM 4.3 inkset has a
larger range.  It is also RC paper compatible, and -- just taking a wild
guess here -- cheaper.  But I'm sure there's a lot to be said for the RIP.
(Where did they get the name "RIP?")  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Martin Wesley

Paul,

Tough to compare from the on screen views. Comparing the Septone prints to
the scans on your site I would guess that the VM 4.3 can go colder than the
Septones. On the warm end things aren't so clear as the Septone looks more
red warm and the VM 4.3 more yellow warm. Really need to see the prints side
by side.

It will be interesting to see what ConeTech has to offer at PMA. I bet it
includes a variable tone and 7 ink solution though. Pretty sure their
solution and Sundance's will be more costly than MIS inks and your curves.
No surprise there!

The really nice thing to my view is that there will be multiple solutions to
appeal to a wide range of needs, tastes and budgets. Things are continuing
to get better for us end users. It should really be an interesting year as
these products become available and user reports come in.

Martin Wesley

http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html



----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
To: "DigitalB&WPrint" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3


> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new Sundance
> Septone inkset at
>
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my UC VM 4.3
> inkset for comparison.  See
>
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
>
> It may be my imagination, but it seems like the UC VM 4.3 inkset has a
> larger range.  It is also RC paper compatible, and -- just taking a wild
> guess here -- cheaper.  But I'm sure there's a lot to be said for the RIP.
> (Where did they get the name "RIP?")  (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
>
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
>

Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Jeff Korte <jeffkorte@mn.rr.com>

Hello Paul,

I am considering the switch from your MIS VM hex set to the new 
UC VM 4.3 when it is available.

Do you have any suggestions to make this as smooth as 
possible? I read something about higher load pigments. Will 
this be a problem in my 1280?

I assume I should replace the cartridges on my CIS. Will I be 
able to use my existing curves (I use yours and Tylers) for my 
1280 running on a Mac?

I hope to do this smoothly with the least amount of down 
time/tweaking ...

Thanks, the new set looks really good...

Jeff


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul 
Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new 
Sundance
> Septone inkset at
> 
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
> 
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my 
UC VM 4.3
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> inkset for comparison.  See
> 
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Paul Roark

Jeff,

>I am considering the switch from your MIS VM hex set to the new
>UC VM 4.3 when it is available.

>Do you have any suggestions to make this as smooth as
>possible?

>I assume I should replace the cartridges on my CIS.

Yes, I would not mix the inks in the cfs cartridges.

> I read something about higher load pigments. Will
>this be a problem in my 1280?

I don't think it'll be a significant problem.  The midtone grays are diluted
enough that they are no longer high load.

The new matte black, like the Museum black, to me prints a little rougher in
my 1160.  However, the newer printers are smoother there than my 1160.  (In
fact, other 1160s are smoother since my daughter let a hair band with a
metal piece run through the 1160 -- crunch.)

>Will I be able to use my existing curves (I use yours and Tyler's)
>for my 1280 running on a Mac?

Yes.  The system was matched to the old vm system.  The existing 1160 curves
were what I used to be sure the final system worked.

What I've found is that the more recent and better-written curves also
largely take care of the possible black ink roughness.  (Which may be a
non-issue with a good printer.  Also, MIS says the better filtering it does
on production runs helps.)  If the light gray ink curve is pulled up at
about 75% before sinking quickly again to turn on the black ink, that ink
can be restricted to the very darkest areas, where the transition is in such
a dark area that it can't be seen at all.  That is, with good curves there
doesn't seem to be a rough transition.  The old 1160 curves were about the
first I wrote, and they don't do this.

>I hope to do this smoothly with the least amount of down
>time/tweaking ...

I think it is interchangeable, with the caveat that the tones are slightly
different -- much better, in my view.  The "nc" is now a selenium-neutral on
EEM.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
_________________________________________

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul
Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new
Sundance
> Septone inkset at
>
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my
UC VM 4.3
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> inkset for comparison.  See
>
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com

RE: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Jim Panzer

Hey Paul, this is exciting!  I really like the look of the prints on
your site.  I e-mailed you about the sepia toned inks but now I think I am
going to hold out until these are available.  Any idea when they might be
hitting the market?  Thanks.

Jim
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...] 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:21 AM
To: DigitalB&WPrint
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

Jeff,

>I am considering the switch from your MIS VM hex set to the new
>UC VM 4.3 when it is available.

>Do you have any suggestions to make this as smooth as
>possible?

>I assume I should replace the cartridges on my CIS.

Yes, I would not mix the inks in the cfs cartridges.

> I read something about higher load pigments. Will
>this be a problem in my 1280?

I don't think it'll be a significant problem.  The midtone grays are diluted
enough that they are no longer high load.

The new matte black, like the Museum black, to me prints a little rougher in
my 1160.  However, the newer printers are smoother there than my 1160.  (In
fact, other 1160s are smoother since my daughter let a hair band with a
metal piece run through the 1160 -- crunch.)

>Will I be able to use my existing curves (I use yours and Tyler's)
>for my 1280 running on a Mac?

Yes.  The system was matched to the old vm system.  The existing 1160 curves
were what I used to be sure the final system worked.

What I've found is that the more recent and better-written curves also
largely take care of the possible black ink roughness.  (Which may be a
non-issue with a good printer.  Also, MIS says the better filtering it does
on production runs helps.)  If the light gray ink curve is pulled up at
about 75% before sinking quickly again to turn on the black ink, that ink
can be restricted to the very darkest areas, where the transition is in such
a dark area that it can't be seen at all.  That is, with good curves there
doesn't seem to be a rough transition.  The old 1160 curves were about the
first I wrote, and they don't do this.

>I hope to do this smoothly with the least amount of down
>time/tweaking ...

I think it is interchangeable, with the caveat that the tones are slightly
different -- much better, in my view.  The "nc" is now a selenium-neutral on
EEM.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
_________________________________________

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul
Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new
Sundance
> Septone inkset at
>
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my
UC VM 4.3
> inkset for comparison.  See
>
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com



Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage. 


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Paul Roark

Jim,

>... I e-mailed you about the sepia toned inks but now I think I am
>going to hold out until these are available.

I've temporarily shelved my vm-s upgrade project also. It may be that the
new VM 4.3 is warm enough to satisfy all of my light-sepia-tone needs.

Also, I like the idea of using a pure carbon ink.  That is what the warm end
of the vm 4.3 inkset is.  It's a much more light-fast than the sepia end of
the vm-s inkset, which contains a lot of yellow and magenta pigment.  I
considered beefing up the warm end of the 4.3 inkset with some color pigs,
but then the thought of "polluting" the carbon with metamerism-causing
yellow pigments (and somewhat less light-fast magenta pigs) caused me to
back off from that idea.

I think "carbon pigments on archival paper" has the best chance of
persuading the skeptics that our prints will last.  So, while one could
describe the warm tone as "platinum-like" or "old-photo, albumen-like,"  I
think we ought to boast about what it really is -- natural, warm, un-altered
carbon.

> Any idea when they might be hitting the market?

MIS wants to be sure the inks do well in fade testing.  The components do,
but it has not been tested as a completed product.  My fade test ends March
5.  MIS has a brighter Xenon light that will probably reach a point where
the inks can be evaluated before that time.  (MIS does other tests, but they
are not what takes the time.)  So, I expect next week MIS will make its
decision on marketing the mix.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
____________________________________________


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:21 AM
To: DigitalB&WPrint
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

Jeff,

>I am considering the switch from your MIS VM hex set to the new
>UC VM 4.3 when it is available.

>Do you have any suggestions to make this as smooth as
>possible?

>I assume I should replace the cartridges on my CIS.

Yes, I would not mix the inks in the cfs cartridges.

> I read something about higher load pigments. Will
>this be a problem in my 1280?

I don't think it'll be a significant problem.  The midtone grays are diluted
enough that they are no longer high load.

The new matte black, like the Museum black, to me prints a little rougher in
my 1160.  However, the newer printers are smoother there than my 1160.  (In
fact, other 1160s are smoother since my daughter let a hair band with a
metal piece run through the 1160 -- crunch.)

>Will I be able to use my existing curves (I use yours and Tyler's)
>for my 1280 running on a Mac?

Yes.  The system was matched to the old vm system.  The existing 1160 curves
were what I used to be sure the final system worked.

What I've found is that the more recent and better-written curves also
largely take care of the possible black ink roughness.  (Which may be a
non-issue with a good printer.  Also, MIS says the better filtering it does
on production runs helps.)  If the light gray ink curve is pulled up at
about 75% before sinking quickly again to turn on the black ink, that ink
can be restricted to the very darkest areas, where the transition is in such
a dark area that it can't be seen at all.  That is, with good curves there
doesn't seem to be a rough transition.  The old 1160 curves were about the
first I wrote, and they don't do this.

>I hope to do this smoothly with the least amount of down
>time/tweaking ...

I think it is interchangeable, with the caveat that the tones are slightly
different -- much better, in my view.  The "nc" is now a selenium-neutral on
EEM.

Paul
http://www.PaulRoark.com
_________________________________________

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul
Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Well, after Gregory's posting information and photos of the new
Sundance
> Septone inkset at
>
> http://www.inkjetgoodies.com/sundance_septone.htm
>
> I just could not resist posting some comparison images of my
UC VM 4.3
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> inkset for comparison.  See
>
> http://home1.gte.net/res0a2zt/V-tone.html
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Sundance Septone v. UC VM 4.3

2003-02-27 by Jeff Korte <jeffkorte@mn.rr.com>

A call to MIS today got this answer about the new set...

"maybe in a month or so"

Not too encouraging. 

I too am excited about the new set. And timely it is. With the 
announcement of pixelpicasso (sp) and PMA this weekend, it 
makes the decision harder to make. The sooner this set comes 
to market, the better (for me, anyway).

Jeff



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jim 
Panzer <jimp@r...> wrote:
> 
> 	Hey Paul, this is exciting!  I really like the look of the prints on
> your site.  I e-mailed you about the sepia toned inks but now I 
think I am
> going to hold out until these are available.  Any idea when they 
might be
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> hitting the market?  Thanks.
> 
> Jim

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.