Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more

2003-02-27 by Julian Thomas

shadow tutorial here http://www.piezography.com/ts/shadows.html

scanning workflow here http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/cone_ts/scanning.htm

Julian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco Fogarolo" <fogmarco@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:15 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more


> Julian
>
> Where I can find the JC's tutorial on shadow detail?
>
> Thanks
>
> Marco
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Julian Thomas [mailto:julianthomas@t...]
> > > Sent: marted\ufffd 25 febbraio 2003 9:57
> > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more
> > > archival than EAM/EEM !?
> > >
> > >
> > > I've been doing this for years now, but 'I've only just
> > > started reading and
> > > following JC's tutorial on shadow detail - there are just
> > > sooo many tricks
> > > to learn!
> > >
> > > Julian
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <bob@b...>
> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:33 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated
> > > more archival
> > > than EAM/EEM !?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Alessandro & Julian: Thanks, I will try your suggestions as they
> > > > really make sense. I have to agree that so many of my
> > > printing issues
> > > > and questions come back to basic use of Photoshop, an area
> where I
> > > > still need improvement.
> > > > Bob Michaels
> > > >
> > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
> > > Alessandro Pardi
> > > > <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Bob,
> > > > >
> > > > > one reason might be that the image hasn't 100% blacks. You can
> > > > verify it in
> > > > > Photoshop: if the darkest parts of the picture, those
> > > that should be
> > > > pure
> > > > > black, with no detail, even read 1 or 2 rather than 0, you're
> not
> > > > getting
> > > > > the best blacks in the final print.
> > > > > As someone else posted not long ago, checking this is worth
> as a
> > > > standard
> > > > > routine before printing, but the more so when comparing
> papers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps,
> > > > > Alessandro
> > > > >
>
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.