Re: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more
2003-02-27 by Marco Fogarolo
Julian Where I can find the JC's tutorial on shadow detail? Thanks Marco > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Julian Thomas [mailto:julianthomas@t...] > > Sent: marted\ufffd 25 febbraio 2003 9:57 > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated more > > archival than EAM/EEM !? > > > > > > I've been doing this for years now, but 'I've only just > > started reading and > > following JC's tutorial on shadow detail - there are just > > sooo many tricks > > to learn! > > > > Julian > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <bob@b...> > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 2:33 AM > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] HWM v. EEM v. HPR, was: HWM rated > > more archival > > than EAM/EEM !? > > > > > > > Alessandro & Julian: Thanks, I will try your suggestions as they > > > really make sense. I have to agree that so many of my > > printing issues > > > and questions come back to basic use of Photoshop, an area where I > > > still need improvement. > > > Bob Michaels > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > > Alessandro Pardi > > > <alessandro.pardi@i...> wrote: > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > > > one reason might be that the image hasn't 100% blacks. You can > > > verify it in > > > > Photoshop: if the darkest parts of the picture, those > > that should be > > > pure > > > > black, with no detail, even read 1 or 2 rather than 0, you're not > > > getting > > > > the best blacks in the final print. > > > > As someone else posted not long ago, checking this is worth as a > > > standard > > > > routine before printing, but the more so when comparing papers.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Alessandro > > > >