Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

RE: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT

RE: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT

2003-02-27 by Darren Collins

Wouldn't it be more the lens than the sensor?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: grnskl <grnskl@...> [mailto:grnskl@...]
Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2003 4:40 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT


Perhaps this is tangential, but given today's black and white 
newspaper images of the missiles beside the mosques, perhaps not. 
Does anyone know what sensors are used in the satellites that are 
capable of resolving license plate numbers from miles above the 
Earth? Where would one begin to track this down? How soon will we be 
seeing this technology in consumer cameras? 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT

2003-02-27 by B. Alex Pettit Jr. <a_pettit_jr@yahoo.co

The technology involves advanced optics and imaging technology using
low noise CCD chips, but with adaptive optics playing the major role
in high res systems. That 'license plate' resolution was something I
remember hearing about in the 90s. It must be well beyond that now.

Search for Starfire Optical Range for an unclassified glimpse of what
is being done.... http://www.coseti.org/starfire.htm

Best,
Alex

Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT

2003-02-27 by Truman Prevatt

The original Corona program was declassified some years back as was the 
fact of the National Reconnaissance Office. Corona was the first space 
based imaging system. There are quite a few details on the optics on the 
NRO webpage, www.nro.gov.  While these programs are highly classified ( 
the very existence of the NRO was classified until about '92), we have 
seen bits and pieces from these sensors from time to time. The most 
spectacular may have been the eruption of Mt. St. Helen. There is a lot 
of speculation about these systems. Might want to do a google search.

The technology used is highly classified and is very expensive. It will 
be quite a few years before we see it in consumer cameras.

Today there are commercial satellite photo systems flying that sell 
images. You tell it where you want imaged, pay them and they deliver the 
images on the next pass. The Spot system flown by the French comes to 
mind, but there are others.  These images are quite good considering it 
is a commercial venture.  

When I was with Loral we were in the process of designing a multisensor 
space based system to provide services to the agriculture business. We 
were going to fly long wave length IR, short wave length IR, EO and a UV 
sensor.  Data from these sensors were processed to determine the water 
content of the crops, if they needed fertlizer, potential fungus 
infestation, etc. We validated the technology from aircraft. The goal 
was to provide this service at about one dollar per square mile of area 
covered per pass.

I don't know if Loral Space is still looking at this program or not. 
This technology might have been transfered to Lockeed Martin when Loral 
merged with Martin.

Truman



grnskl wrote:

>Perhaps this is tangential, but given today's black and white 
>newspaper images of the missiles beside the mosques, perhaps not. 
>Does anyone know what sensors are used in the satellites that are 
>capable of resolving license plate numbers from miles above the 
>Earth? Where would one begin to track this down? How soon will we be 
>seeing this technology in consumer cameras? 
>
>  
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Satellite digital photography OT

2003-02-27 by Eric Maquiling

On 02/27 08:26, Truman Prevatt wrote:

[...]

> space based system to provide services to the agriculture business. We 
> were going to fly long wave length IR, short wave length IR, EO and a UV 
> sensor.  Data from these sensors were processed to determine the water 
> content of the crops, if they needed fertlizer, potential fungus 
[...]

Man, you never know what you learn on these photo lists!  Amazing
information...and I live in Salinas Valley....farms freaking
everywhere!

-- 
Eric

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.