Digital BW, The Print

Oops, Same in the darkroom as you, is what I meant. I didn't mean to make it
sound like that comparison was original to me.

Todd

> 
>>> tangible, that I'm not considering, that outweighs some of the benefit of
>>> discretely separated boxes and Zees? Do you know what I mean?
>> 
>> I hope so, did I?
> 
> Yes you did, thank you.
> 
> BTW, I was the same way in the darkroom. I hated my friends that could shoot
> Plus-x, develop it in straight D-76, and some version of variable contrast
> paper, developed in develop 1:2, left untoned. All right out of Photo 101,
> and read off the products label. Not only were their results excellent, I
> was jealous that they could be satisfied with the simplicity of it. I've
> always got to try to beat the system. I'll never learn. ;-)
> 
> Todd
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
>