Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Digital Negatives with 1160

2003-03-04 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>

I was going to get into this but decided I don't have the time or money 
right now. But I did a lot of research and I can tell you that most of 
the people who were making negs via an imagesetter are now using an 
inkjet. but you have to use that pictorico film and it is very 
expensive. (especially when you factor in all the other costs)

-mh

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Ken Carney" <
kcarney1@c...> wrote:
> 
> 
> > With the hope of combining the strengths (while avoiding the
> > weaknesses) of the digital and wet darkrooms, I've been exploring the
> > possibility of creating digital negatives with my 1160. I've read
> > that this can be done --
> > http://www.danburkholder.com/Pages/misc_pages/digital_neg_faq.htm --
> > however, I'm not sure just how much work, problems, troubleshooting,
> > etc. it would involve. If anyone on this list has gone down this
> > path, I'd be interesting in hearing about your experiences.
> 
> I have.  As you no doubt know, this is a contact printing technique.  I
> think success will depend on what printing method you use.  If you print
> silver prints, I would give it up and use a tried and true darkroom method,
> i.e., an enlarger.  Silver paper, e.g., air-dried glossy fiber paper, is
> pretty unforgiving.  OTOH, if you print "alt", such as palladium, it may
> work out for you.  These prints are made on essentially watercolor paper and
> hide a lot of faults.  OTOH again, a pt/pd print will have a much greater
> tonal range than a silver print.  A digital 8x10 neg is just not going to
> give the same range and impact as an 8x10 in-camera negative.  If I were
> you, to try it out without a lot of cost, I would use the service bureau
> that Dan recommends and have negs made on at least a 3,600 dpi imagesetter.
> The 2,400 dpi imagesetter you commonly see won't cut it.   If you don't like
> the results, the desktop solution (inkjet neg) sure isn't going to work.
> 
> For my own part, the darkroom  (silver and pt/pd) is closed and I print
> everything on an Epson converted to b&w.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   --Ken Carney
>     www.kencarney.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.