Thanks for the reply. It sounds like we're doing things the same way (although I'm printing from a Windows PC). My output does have a noticeably blueish cast, but the shadows do seem a bit "lifted" with the Photorealistic box checked. -Robert --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "digikdm" <monroekd@h...> wrote: > I actually select adobe rgb in the print space because some of my > images are in grayscale rather than adobe rgb. if your image is in > adobe rgb, i'm not sure if it would matter if you selected "same as > source" or adobe rgb. it would appear to make no difference , but you > could test it. > i am working in OS 9, and i believe that the natural color box is > automatically not checked in the photorealistic mode. So for me , > that is unchecked all the time. > as far a what photorealistic does , i'm not sure. but without it, > you will get muddy shadows. you're not talking to an expert here. > i got to this point by trial and error. > do my prints still show some unwanted tinting... yes, but it's > minimal, and i am willing to accept the situation as is for the time > being. The match-up with the mi monitor is pretty darn close. i'm > considering a RIP from epson or IP , but i'm going to wait for a > while and just keep digitallizing my backlog of images. > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" > <LA_Native@h...> wrote: > > A couple questions for clarification: > > > > Under Photoshop's Print Space/Profile, do you indicate "Adobe RGB" > > or "Same as Source"? > > > > Also, in your Epson settings, do you mark "Color Controls", Mode > > = "Photorealistic", and leave Epson Natural Color unchecked? > > > > Lastly, just what does "Photorealistic" really do? > > > > Thanks > > Robert Ades > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "digikdm" > > <monroekd@h...> wrote: > > > After numerous test prints under a variety of settings using > > nascent > > > epson software provided with the printer and no third party > RIP,the > > > combination that I found works best for B&W prints is as follows: > > > 1. WORK AND PRINT in Adobe1998 color space. DO NOT use > any "Epson > > > print space" settings( such as Epson 2200 matte MK) or you will > be > > > rewarded with a spectrum of casts, usually magenta and /or > green, > > > depending on other settings. Obviously , I did not try every > color > > > space combination , but the above seems to work. > > > 2. Always use the photorealistic color setting under > the "advanced" > > > settings.Do not use "no color management" or you'll be rewarded > with > > > smudged shadow areas /loss of detail. > > > 3.For best results with minimal color shifts in various lighting, > > use > > > Matte paper and matte black ink. > > > > > > With these settings I've found that my grays and blacks actually > > > match what I see on the monitor.I've have only dealt with B&W and > > > don't know if the above holds up for color prints. I am satisfied > > > with the prints I'm getting now , but I wish Epson would refund > > all > > > the ink and paper I used to come to this conclusion.Their manual > > that > > > comes with the printer will send you off in the wrong direction > for > > > B&W.Maybe this will save someone else many hours of frustration.
Message
Re: 2200 epiphany (questions)
2003-03-07 by Robert
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.