Harald, you wrote: > Ernst: <... Schoellershammer (Germany) brought some inkjet coated papers on > the market about 18 months ago. They claimed that the paper was coated in the > paper pulp before actual papermaking and that it had advantages.... > > > I didn't realize this, but if true, they sure didn't do a very good marketing > job! ;-) Since Edmunds claims the patent, I assume the Schoellershammer > process is somewhat different. It isn't so specific on the website as they said it at the introduction but reading between the lines helps in this case: http://www.schoellershammer.de/eng/prod_fine_art/fine_art_main.ht ml What I also miss is a reference to a pigment ink variety, maybe their conclusion became later on the same as mine then. Checked the prospect papers and proof sheets that I got (24 months ago exactly) and there they wrote it was compatible with pigment printers like the Epson 9500. With emphasise on dye ink and better fade properties it gets more and more similarity to the FutureWales claims. I must have some normal Bockingford aquarel paper (non inkjet) and I still have a dye printer, could try that out. Wilhelm tested Iris dye inks on normal aquarel papers like Arches quite favourably, it can't be that history repeats itself ;-) Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Infused Paper? + PMA report: DIMA Shoot Outs results available
2003-03-12 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.