Paul, In 1966, I could have bought a 16x20 print of "Moonrise" for $200. Ansel had an exhibit in Santa Barbara when I was just beginning my Brooks Studies. Photography as an "Art Form" wasn't yet established. At the time, I would have loved to have bought it, but it would have been equivalent to about $4000 today, and I was one of the REALLY poor Brooks Students, (I was there on the GI Bill), so that was totally out of the question! But I do remember it, and it did not have the black sky of the more recent versions. Of course I didn't know that then, because I had never seen that print with the black sky. I just loved Ansels work, and all of the F64 Group. I love the black sky of later versions. It MAKES the print!!! Others may disagree, but I know what I like! Also, it of course makes for a MUCH more dramatic image! If you just print it like a commercial print, it doesn't have enough punch to carry the image as fine art. Jerry I could like somerset velvet if you could get a nicer black on it, and if it were just a tad whiter. It has a very nice texture. I still love the torchon blacks, but not the texture! Eclipse looks pretty nice to me. Photo Matte, too. Epson Archival and Torchon are still the black champions though.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Technically Perfect Print was: Uncoated Papers
2001-09-21 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.