I went through this and decided on the 1280 over the 2200. Reasons, a) price, b) no matter how much you work at it, getting rid of color shifts will be difficult so I would find myself waiting until a quadtone support for the 2200 and c) there is a lot of quadtone support for the 1280. Some people complain about the speed - or lack thereof of the 1280. But I will tell you it is a lot faster than the wet darkroom! I can wait a few minutes to get a print our. No matter how fast it comes out of the printer you can evaluate it for about 24 hours anyway till it completely dires. I got a 1280 about 6 months ago and am quite happy with it. Truman xyz wrote: >Look, I'm new to the list and new to digital. I used >to have an enlarger and do black and white, but that >fell by the way side. I've still got my Canon slr's, >but wanted a digital for snapshots and thought a 3.2 >mp camera would be enough--the S230--and it is enough, >for snapshots. But it's nothing when you were used to >Kodachrome 25 and Panatomic-X and that slow speed >Ilford, whatever the name of it. Now I know that 6 mp >is not enough either, and 12 is probably not enough. > >Anyway, I'd like to get back into black and white, but >not on the same level some of you guys are. I'm an >amateur--I used to sell some stuff, but I doubt I do >it again. > >Maybe 5,000 dpi film scanners will come down in price >soon. That seems to be the way to go. > >Anyway, it really looks like Epson has screwed us by >pulling the 1160 from the United States. Things would >be clear if that hadn't happened. Looks like the 1280 >might be the way to go? Thing is, b&w on the printer >I've got now--an HP5550 is not really bad. There is >some coloration, but I'm not sure this can't be >straightened out to a large extent in PS. > >It's good to see there are people who are into this, >because that means companies will put out products. >But Joe Cone's stuff--man, like, he wants an arm and a >leg for it. I'm not going to be hanging stuff up in >museums. If I had anything that good, I could maybe >pay one of you guys to do the printing. > >Any comments very much appreciated. > > >Reese > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more >http://tax.yahoo.com > > >Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > >If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > >Please follow these basic guidelines: >- Include your full name with your message. >- Include the address of your website, if you have one. >- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. >- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. >- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." >- Complete your Yahoo profile. >- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Sorry If This Has Been Beat On Already...
2003-04-07 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.