Digital BW, The Print

>
> Because he is a journalist. You have to be able to believe the
> photos he takes are real. It would be like a writer making up a
> quote.  If you can't believe what a writer is writing why bother
> reading the story. Same with a photojournalist. If you can\u2019t
> believe the photographs you see in the paper what is the point of
> having them. It\u2019s a credibility issue.  If you can't believe
> the information in the L.A. Times why read it.
>
> Steve

Oops - sorry Steve, I thought you were referring to the Gene Smith
photograph in the discussion

tim

PS - RE: LA Times - what about the photographs you don't see in the
paper...? How can you believe what you don't know (or not, as the case may
be) - that is, what's the point of honest journos