Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] It might be a sin, but ...

2003-04-10 by Robert Morrison

On 4/10/03 6:21 AM, "Timothy Hammond" <bthphoto@...> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm just a lurker on this list, and It's clear to me that I'm a neophyte and
> can learn a lot of valuable things by just sitting back an listening. But,
> even though I have a feeling I'm about to commit a sin, I have to ask, does
> anyone have thoughts on printing B&W with dye sub?  It takes some tweaking,
> but I've gotten what I consider to be some really nice prints from my Olympus
> P-400.  There's clearly a size issue (you mean size really *does* matter?!),
> but I'd love to hear other folks' thoughs and opinions.  Thanks. --- Tim

There is no sin in getting prints that you like.  The main issues on this
list for BW prints are:

1. Neutrality--can you get a neutral gray scale without crossovers--this is
less of a problem with quad ink sets...or all gray inks than without color
inks--that's why people tend to favor quads

2. Longevity--pure pigments will last much longer than dyes--do you know
what your dye sub prints are rated for?

3. Metamerism--do the different inks that are used to make up your print
react differently to different types of lighting.  For instance when you
take a print from day light to incandescent light is there a sudden shift in
a part of the spectrum causing you to loose neutrality.

4. Dither--can you see dots particularly in the highlights or at points
where various inks kick in and out--my guess is that this would not be a
problem for dye sub because it is pretty close to pure contone printing.

Robert

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.