Nick, I don't have black banding problems on my 1280 or 2200 when used with OPM. However, in recent testing I have found that OPM likes 720 dpi files best, preferably in 16bit. Have you given that a try? For the purposes of testing, you can just try to res up an existing file in Photoshop, using bicubic interpolation. I am guessing you already did whatever it takes to clean the heads, including under the carriage, and have tested for different positions of the head lever. IOW, I assume you've done everything to eliminate any actual hardware / ink delivery problems, and have narrowed the issue to software, right? On another issue - I am a bit confused in reading your post. You say: > I've personally found most of my initial prints to be more impressive > on the 1280 - either due to smaller dots or due to greater sensitivity > to detail in subtle transitions in the mid-tones. Perhaps not > surprising considering there's just two black ink cartridges. The 1280 does not have 2 black ink carts (or shouldn't). You may have meant something else?... Regarding 1280 vs 2200, depending on what inkset you load, the 2200 will have a technological advantage (speed among others as you noted), but the 1280 is capable of very fine results. I use mine with Selenium Piezotones and - once properly profiled - love the results. The problems I used to have were related to the canned profiles that came with the old piezo export plug-in which produced simply ridiculous prints. IJC took care of all that very quickly! Antonis Antonis
Message
Re: OPM/IJC on 1280 vs 2200
2003-04-18 by Antonis Ricos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.