Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: OPM/IJC on 1280 vs 2200

2003-04-18 by Antonis Ricos

Nick,

I don't have black banding problems on my 1280 or 2200 when used with 
OPM. However, in recent testing I have found that OPM likes 720 dpi files 
best, preferably in 16bit. Have you given that a try? For the purposes of 
testing, you can just try to res up an existing file in Photoshop, using bicubic 
interpolation. 

I am guessing you already did whatever it takes to clean the heads, including 
under the carriage, and have tested for different positions of the head lever. 
IOW, I assume you've done everything to eliminate any actual hardware / ink 
delivery problems, and have narrowed the issue to software, right?



On another issue - I am a bit confused in reading your post. You say:


> I've personally found most of my initial prints to be more impressive 
> on the 1280 - either due to smaller dots or due to greater sensitivity 
> to detail in subtle transitions in the mid-tones. Perhaps not 
> surprising considering there's just two black ink cartridges. 

The 1280 does not have 2 black ink carts (or shouldn't). You may have meant 
something else?...


Regarding 1280 vs 2200, depending on what inkset you load, the 2200 will 
have a technological advantage (speed among others as you noted), but the 
1280 is capable of very fine results. I use mine with Selenium Piezotones and 
- once properly profiled - love the results.  The problems I used to have were 
related to the canned profiles that came with the old piezo export plug-in 
which produced simply ridiculous prints. IJC took care of all that very quickly!

Antonis



Antonis

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.